As I was reading this first section of Part Two, I felt that despite the
change in characters and plot from chapter to chapter (which was consistent
with the structure of Part One) the general narrative being conveyed through
these different stories and perspectives was overwhelmingly similar. In almost
every chapter that we read, Nemirovsky inserts a description of how the
townspeople, and primarily the women, felt about the Germans. While this was
not completely unexpected, for the Germans did just take over the town, I was a
little surprised by the way that all of the ladies seemed so very interested by
the physical appearance and refinement of these enemy soldiers.
It appeared to me that almost all of them, especially Lucile and
Madeleine, were stuck between admiration, attraction and repulsion by their
presence. And indeed the way that Nemirovsky describes them does evoke almost a
sense of awe of these people who are so cultured yet are at the same time held
responsible for so much of the pain and suffering that France has endured. On
page 216, Lucile Angellier notices that Lieutenant Bruno, “was young, slim,
with beautiful hands and wide eyes.” A little bit later, and “in spite of herself,
[she] walked more slowly” for she was seemingly mesmerized by his hands.
Yet I also found it interesting that the soldiers, in comparison with
the French men that Nemirovsky describes, symbolized more than just ‘the enemy.’
They represented a difference in class, which echoed the status of the two countries
during that time as well; the refined German soldiers were winning the war,
while the lowly French peasant farmers and village people lived under the thumb
of these educated officers. I think this issue of class will become an
important undertone that will add a deeper level of significance to any of the
tension between Germans and French regarding the war.
Are you saying that you think Nemirovsky's portrayal of the Frenchmen and German men is accurate? Unclear.
ReplyDelete