Irène
Némirovsky’s novel, Suite Française, is very unique. What sets it apart from
other accounts of the Nazi occupation of Paris is the fact it was written not
only while these events were taking place but it expressed the profound
reflections on the times by the author as well. Rarely, if at all, in literature
is a diary of events combined with a personal interpretation of those same
incidents in the same literary work.
The stories
about the various situations of different but intertwined people portray the
author’s viewpoint, insights and conclusions into the reaction of average
citizens to a time of war. What most war narratives often overlook is the
silence, the lulls created between short-lived attacks when people carry on
with their lives. These respites from the battles of war make up the most of
their time. This would be the kind of life, the majority of the population
would experience, moments off the battlefield.
Némirovsky’s
upbringing and personal life influenced her reflections on the ways certain
types of people most likely handled the war. She came from an upper class
family, and had a dysfunctional relationship with her mother whom cared more about
appearance than tending for her daughter. This dismay with Nemirovsky’s held
her upbringing is manifest in Madame Péricand, the female patriarch of a wealthy
family whom refuses to stray from the proper values upon which her societal
position is based, even in the extraordinary times of war that call for
flexibility. On the other hand, Jeanne Michaud, is a lower class woman whom is
what Madame Péricand and Némirovsky’s own mother were not: she
displays a compassion for people without having underlying personal motives of
self-promotion. Rather, Ms. Michaud motivation is solely for the actual good of
the people she helps. The actions of these woman during the tragedies of war
represented Némirovsky’s reflection on people whom she knew.
She is
frequently sarcastic and uses irony in her rhetoric to persuade the audience to
arrive at their own conclusion. She avoids bluntly defined statements which
have no room for interpretation. Némirovsky’s style and portrayals allow the reader
to connect with history apart from the gore of war by reflecting on how the war
impacted the lives of people. How the war impacted the majority of the population
should not be discounted as it was frequently a life altering experience.
Excellent point about the unique nature of this work. It is amazing to have such depth of characterization for someone actually living through the trauma. Most war- or revolution-era literature I've read is either political or seemingly unconnected with events and formulaic (gothic, pastoral, voyage). Those that try to marry psychological realism with in-depth, slow narration of a specific time and place... well, this is the only one I know. It would be good for you to insert at least one citation from the book so we know exactly what has inspired your thoughts. Thanks!
ReplyDelete