I appreciate and respect
everything Gabrielle Chanel sacrificed and worked for to launch her
career. She epitomizes the stereotypical
“American Dream” although she is French.
She begins as someone who fixes the work of other designer’s patrons and
ends up being the designer herself. It
is no small feat and is truly remarkable.
Along with sharing this side of Chanel’s story, Coco Avant Chanel tackles many gendered arguments in the span of
almost two hours.
From discussing the premise
of this movie with my sister and watching it with my mom, they were both more
invested and intrigued by the behavior of the men in this movie especially
Etienne than in Chanel’s rise to fame.
My mom was particularly put off by the scene when Etienne is talking
with Boy and says something to the effect of “I don’t know how you all treat
your women in England, but we do not make them work in France, we still have
some semblance of gallantry.” I have
tried to go back and find the exact wording of this quote and will post it in
the comment section if I can, but it was something to this effect. My mother was infuriated by the comment. Why is it that allowing women to work is
insulting to women and unbecoming of a gentleman? Is it because working is too difficult for a
woman, so a man must take charge? Are
women to dainty? The rapid torrent of
questions went on and on, etc. etc,.
At first glance, I agree with
my mom. It is insulting that a man
allowing a woman not to work is considered chivalrous, yet while I suspect the
comment was made by Etienne as a means to insult England rather than defend
France’s virtue, I can see how from his perspective he was being
chivalrous. He probably truly believed
women should not work because they were incapable. It is clear this way of thinking is wrong but
is his ignorance a valid excuse?
Personally, I do not think
so. I am all for chivalry and think guys
should open doors in the physical sense for me, but I do not need them to open
what people refer to as the metaphorical doors for me. Etienne offers to marry Coco in order to
solve her problems and help her make a name for herself rather than support her
dreams and recognize her talent. His ignorance
is not an excuse. He should have
recognized her gift and been able to understand that paired with her determination
and perseverance Coco was more than capable of achieving success on her own. There is a line between gallantry and
pigheadedness that Etienne fails to recognize throughout the majority of the
film, which is a shame as it is a very important line.
Interesting yet a bit anachronistic. See Tori Lew's posting and my comments about the historical context of the historical period represented in this film which is about what Chanel was before she became "Chanel." However your comment about French gallantry and chivalry is interesting to me, as it recalls Edmund Burke's notion that the age of chivalry is dead (In Reflections on the French Revolution, 1790). Opportunity for political commentary, perhaps?
ReplyDelete