While reading Èmilie Carles’
A Life of Her Own, and having
the thought of Suite Française in my
head, comparisons were plentiful between the works. First and foremost was the
comparison of how parents dealt with loss. Carles’ father refused to truly
acknowledge the pain of loss and did not let himself dwell on it, such as when
Catherine died and he went straight back to working on the farm instead of
letting himself mourn. All the farmers in the book were like this, treating the
death of their child as an inevitable event that could not get in the way of
making a living for them and their family- the loss of a calf that could be
sold evoked more emotion in them. On the other hand, the parents in Suite Française were broken by the loss
of a child, as the Michauds were lost without their son who had left for war,
and Mrs. Angeillier became hard and almost insane with the absence of her son. Suite Française also seemed much more
innocent than A Life of Her Own, as
there were no gory death scenes and life quickly gets back to peace and normality
once the Germans came, while Carles recount tales of farmers killing themselves
to avoid being a burden and children and mothers dying because of the unwillingness
of their families to ask for help. The two books together showed two sides of
France and how the difference in class and customs between them dictated how
the people lived and the problems that they faced.
An interesting reflection on the two books. I think it is curious that the most hardened and least emotional people in Suite Francaise are not the poor but the vetry wealthy: characters such as Charles Langelet, for example. What do you make of that?
ReplyDelete